There is something quite arresting in the style of Days in
the History of Silence. It has a particularly soft voice, a reflective tone, a
sense of much unspoken, a kind of selfless absence. Yet it is a story all about
the self, the loss of self, what makes the self, the point at which the self
can become undone, from which it can never be rebuilt. It is a beautiful, sad
novel which makes you think.
The story is narrated by Eva, an older women whose husband,
Simon, has stopped speaking. The source of his ‘silence’ is a question around
which the story revolves. It is not clear, not ever made clear, if this is
simply a matter of age, a deterioration of the brain, Altzheimers, perhaps, or
a stroke, or a choice Simon has made to withdraw into silence. This is the
question that occupies Eva throughout the novel.
In the course of exploring Simon’s silence we discover a
history of silences, both Simon’s and Eva’s. These are silences which have
dictated the course of their combined history. Simon’s silence centres around
his childhood, as a Jewish child growing up during the war Simon (Shimon) was
forced into hiding and silence in order to survive. Yet his silence about his
past continued, shared only with Eva. His history, the fact of his Jewishness,
is something about which neither of them speak even to their children. Having
had silence imposed on him through hatred, Simon continues this silence to the
point of extremity. Perhaps, then, it is the self-imposed silence which leads
to his silence now?
Then there is Eva, her own silence generates from giving up
her child, a son, that she had before she and Simon met, with whom she could
not generate any kind of bond and who she gave up with apparent relief. When
she told Simon about her son, Simon who had lost his own family in death camps
and war, he is ashamed of her and encourages her to seek him out. Yet she does
not. Even so, she tends the grave of a stranger in the local church and, at
times, appears to desire to speak about the boy that she lost to the local
pastor. Yet she does not. Silence is ingrained in both Eva and Simon to the
point that not speaking becomes the norm.
The final core silence centres around their cleaner, Marija,
an immigrant from Latvia who becomes central to their lives and yet they
dismiss suddenly and with apparent ease. The reason for her dismissal is
another secret, a source of silence. It is a silence heaped on other silences,
the source of a gulf between Eva and Simon and their children.
What emerges from these silences is the consequence of
keeping secrets, a history of silent shame centring around events that neither
party could control or about which they should feel any shame. Yet once the
secret, the silence, begins it becomes almost impossible to undo it. Both Eva
and Simon make attempts, like here where Eva discovers a letter in a book that
Simon gave to their daughter Helena:
I can’t manage to
interpret the continuation of the sentence, it is nearly rubbed out because of
a faulty pen. But I believe the final word is long. Far too long. My girls, he
continues, you have become so big. So grown up. He starts over again, trying to find an introduction.
I become angry. I
become angry because he has decided to tell them on his own, without having
talked to me about it first.”
There is a sense, here, that Eva is angry with Simon and yet
also that she suspects Simon’s withdrawal is a sign of his anger towards her.
That she has forced him to keep his secret, that their combined silence has
prevented him from being honest about who he is. Yet at the same time, perhaps
she is angry because Simon has withdrawn into his silence, accepted it, whereas
Eva still desires to confess.
It is a complex, softly spoken and well crafted book. It
leaves a lot unsaid, as the best fiction often does. Consequently, it is a book
that stays with you, that leaves you to ruminate on it, secretly and in
silence, for days afterwards.