This book was a gift from a friend, and it’s been
languishing on my shelves for some time (as books often are) waiting to be
read. It’s exactly the kind of book I would like: non-fiction (because I am
trying to read more non-fiction…and succeeding), written by a woman about a
woman, sciency. All those things add up to a considerate gift. So why had it
been sitting on my shelves for so long? The answer: it seemed like quite a
daunting read. So when I signed up to the #TBR20 initiative over on Twitter,
this seemed like the exact kind of book that should be on my list.
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks tells the story of one
woman’s search to find the story of the life of another woman, a poor black
woman who died in the 1950s from cervical cancer, whose cells have changed the
face of modern medicine. The cells, known as HeLa, have allowed significant
medical advancement to be made because they were the first cells that were
successfully grown and kept alive outside the human body. As a student of
biology Skloots learned of the HeLa cells and how important they’ve been in
medical science – enabling development of a polio vaccine, cancer therapies,
cloning and gene mapping – but discovered that little was known about the woman
herself. So she set out to write this story which is at once a personal history
- piecing together Henrietta Lacks from her medical records and the vague
memories of friends and family, many of which have suffered as a result of the
famous cells - as well as a potted history of cell culture, including both the
development and ethics of this branch of medical science.
What follows is an incredibly engaging story. Skloots is
open about her investigations, she manages to insert her search for Henrietta
Lacks’s story into the book though it’s neither arrogant nor self-serving or
intrusive. Instead we learn through Rebecca’s eyes how the Lacks family have
been affected both by their personal loss – the loss of Henrietta as a mother,
partner, cousin – as well as the impact of having Henrietta’s famous cells
linked to their family. There is also the ethical impact: in the case of the
medicine industry millions of dollars have been earned selling Henrietta’s
cells, yet the Lacks family, including Henrietta’s children, are so poor they
can’t even afford medical insurance. Henrietta’s cells have benefitted millions,
enabled many people to become rich, yet not the Lacks family itself.
This leads, neatly, onto the question of medical ethics
which is explored in some depth in the book. Skloot manages to sit very
carefully on the fence neither judging for or against the medicine industry. On
the one hand there is considerable benefit in allowing the medical profession to
conduct research openly and freely, so the idea of allowing individuals a proprietary
interest over their tissues and cells could inhibit medical progress. On the
other hand, some appalling abuses have taken place in both the context of medical
research programmes and the acquisition of samples from living patients. It
raises some interesting questions about the nature of informed medical consent
that still need to be answered today. I found myself horrified by stories of
medical experimentation such injecting healthy and unhealthy patients with HeLa
cells to see if they developed cancer, without telling them that there was a
cancer risk (many injectees went on to develop tumours). In many cases these
experiments were conducted on black people, and there’s a sense throughout the
book that the black community were subjected to some terrible treatment simply
on account of being black, including Henrietta’s deaf & dumb daughter Elsie
who died shortly after Henrietta in an overcrowded and dirty asylum where she,
too, had been experimented on. There’s also the question of whether allowing
organisations to apply a proprietary right over things like genes is, in and of
itself, a greater inhibiting factor. The idea that organisations must be
allowed to make money or research will not happen is a silly one; history is
peppered with examples of scientists undertaking research as a matter of
following curiosity, or out of a personal interest (loss of a family member) or
simply for the common good. Included in this is George Gey, the man whose lab
took Henrietta’s cells and grew and grew them. Cells that he gave away, freely,
enabling others to conduct research and make money whilst he remained always on
the cusp of broke.
But this is a story about Henrietta, and Skloots manages,
through careful piecing together, to construct the story of Henrietta Lacks. It
is a name more of us ought to know, to understand how her contribution has led
to significant medical advancement. Her story is not an untroubling one; her
children have led difficult lives and are variously proud and fed up with the
story of HeLa. Skloot doesn’t let us forget that this is a story about a woman,
a family and a community, that at the heart of the HeLa story is a dead young
woman who left behind a grieving family which have never quite recovered from
her loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment