Sometimes there are books you pick up and you know instantly
that you’re going to love them. For me, Tracks was one of those books. It may
have helped that I had already watched the movie, and it was this that had
prompted me to decide to read the book anyway, but I’m not convinced that
explains it entirely. Instead there is something about the cadence of the early
paragraphs, the feeling of the words spinning me straight into the mind of this
woman “There are some moments in life
that are like pivots around which your existence turns – small intuitive
flashes, when you know you have done something correct for a change, when you
think you are on the right track. I watched a pale dawn streak the cliffs
Day-glo and realised this was one of them. It was a moment of pure,
uncomplicated confidence – and lasted about ten seconds.”
Tracks is the true story of how Robyn Davidson set out to
cross the Australian desert accompanied only by camels. She arrived in Alice
Springs, a town for which she expresses little affection, equipped only with an
idea, a dog (Diggity) and an independent streak. Davidson had no money, no real
knowledge of camels and no support network in the local vicinity. Consequently
she spent much of her early time in Alice Springs being taken advantage of,
working rubbishy jobs, not really getting anywhere, hating the misogyny and the
nasty attitudes towards the indigent Aboriginal population.
A considerable part of the book describes how Davidson put
off, by any means possible, actually starting out on this journey. For a start,
she knew next to nothing about camels and had to learn from scratch. This
resulted in an exploitative relationship with a local camel rancher called Kurt
whose behaviour was manipulative and abusive. Eventually she exits this
relationship, but does so without getting hold of the camels she needs. Later
on when she does acquire her camels, the problems she faces continue to grow.
The camels are frequently sick, one of her first camels has to be euthanized due
to illness, and when they’re not sick they’re wandering off. This trend
continues on her trek.
I enjoyed the honesty that Davidson conveys in this early
part of the story. That she was torn between going and not going becomes
apparent, and some of her behaviour suggests that not going is the preferred
option. She recognises this in herself, in her uncompromising nature which will
not allow her to borrow the money she needs to start the trek. Then she encounters
Rick Smolen, a photographer for National Geographic who convinces her to allow
the magazine to sponsor her trip. She agrees, but at a cost: Rick must
photograph her along the way and she must allow the magazine to report on her
journey. Thus she embarks on a love/hate relationship with both Rick and the
magazine which crops up at regular intervals throughout the trip (pretty much
whenever Rick appears to take photographs).
The trip itself is the real meat of the story, and Davidson
is equally honest about this. A lot of the time she hates the journey, the
endless walking, the pain, the camels disappearing, the heat, the sweating, the
drab food. Yet there are moments of sheer transcendence, as she describes here:
“And as I walked
through that country, I was becoming involved with it in a most intense and not
yet fully conscious way. The motions and patterns and connections of things
became apparent at a gut level. I didn’t just see the animal tracks, I knew
them. I didn’t just see the bird, I knew it in relationship to its actions and
effects. My environment began to teach me about itself without my full
awareness of the process. It became an animate being of which I was a part[…]
What was once a thing that merely existed became something that everything else
acted upon and had a relationship with and vice versa. In picking up a rock I
could not longer simply say, “this is a rock,” I could now say. “This is part
of a net,” or closer, “This, which everything acts upon, acts.” When this way
of thinking became ordinary for me, I too became lost in the net and the
boundaries of myself stretched out for ever.”
This is not just a story about a journey, but also a story
about a place and time. Whilst Davidson is a key character, so is the desert,
so is Australia and so are the Aboriginal people who make their home in this
seemingly barren land. Davidson reflects widely on the position of Aboriginal
people in Australian society and the cultural identity of the people themselves.
That she generated a high degree of respect and admiration for these oft put
down people is heavily apparent throughout the book, and whilst drawing the
line at a complete understanding the nature of Aboriginal links to the land
become more apparent to Davidson as she traverses the desert. I always find
talk of the Aboriginal beliefs soul-stirring and this was no different hear.
Davidson shares with affection her time travelling with Eddie, an aged
Aboriginal man who helped her across a difficult part of the desert. I think
this part of the story was the most heartwarming for me.
She also discusses in some depth the misogyny inherent in
Australian ‘outback’ culture, and the way in which being absent from it freed
her from social conventions. I’m not sure Davidson set out to write a feminist
book, but throughout her musings she is also unable to contain her absolute
belief that women, people, can achieve anything they set their minds to. As she
explains here:
“I was now a feminist
symbol. I was now an object of ridicule for small-minded sexists, and I was a
crazy, irresponsible adventurer (though not as crazy as I would have been had I
failed). But worse than that, I was now a mythical being who had done something
courageous and outside the possibilities that ordinary people could hope for.
And that was the antithesis of what I wanted to share. That anyone could do
anything. If I could bumble my way across a desert, then anyone could do
anything. And that was true especially for women, who have used cowardice for
so long to protect themselves that it has become a habit.
The world is a
dangerous place for little girls. Besides, little girls are more fragile, more
delicate, more brittle than little boys. ‘Watch out, be careful, watch.’ ‘Don’t
climb trees, don’t dirty your dress, don’t accept lifts from strange men.
Listen, but don’t learn, you won’t need it.’ And so the snail’s antennae grow,
watching for this, looking for that, the underneath of things. The threat. And
so she wastes so much of her energy, seeking to break those circuits, to push
up the millions of tiny thumbs that have tried to quelch energy and creativity
and strength and self-confidence; that have so effectively caused her to build
fences against possibility, daring; that have so effectively kept her
imprisoned inside her notions of self-worthlessness.”
No comments:
Post a Comment